I recently heard from a friend (a trusted source, hopefully) that a hostel warden in one of the new hostels in IITM allowed a foreign student to have female guests till late night, besides letting him have a party which involved alcohol consumption. I would really like to know why this exception has been made (probably over and over again) only for foreign students. Is the reason that he was leaving the country and wanted to throw a farewell party good enough? Well, so are most of us (and is it even necessary to tell you why, now..) Foreign students are exempted from paying for the food in hostel mess too, citing the fact that the food served doesn’t ‘suit’ them. Who gave these people the idea that the food served suits us any better. I remember, how my Indian friends who were vegetarians, when in Paris, had to survive on French fries many a days, because the ‘restaurant’ there wouldn’t serve anything else they could eat. I never heard of any special exemptions made for them. And I am pretty sure that meat : vegatarian is way more serious than half baked rotis : European.
The institute puts harsh and senseless restrictions on students for no reason. And more often than not, they end up hurting rather than making any positive impacts. Think of all those fifth year Dual Degree students who don’t have any labs to go to ( I do :) ) or classes to attend, who have to sleep till 2 in the afternoon because the LAN is cut off till 2 so students attend classes and not surf the net. Dear Dean, or whoever you are, please check, students bunked classes not because they were sufring the net, but because they just slept off really late. And they still do, by the way. Moreover, any issue regarding the LAN ban has the same answer from the authorities: We provide you free net. We make the rules. The problem with this attitude is that it doesn’t make sense, because it doesn’t achieve anything, besides proving the point, that the people who make these rules know jackshit of what’s going on. Or probably they do. I don’t know.
When I went to Kanpur last December, the hospitality of the people was refreshing. The guy running the restaurant did not have a pathetic look on his face giving you the impression that he was serving you free food. I have no clue why they can’t throw Tiffanys out and bring more lively people! But then, this has probably got to do with the standard that is Chennai. Oh yes, it does. (By the way, I do like Tiffs, and Chennai too, but my cribbing mode spares no one :P)
The post must have sounded like I have serious issues with the institute (like it even cares). Oh and I do, but having said that, I have come to call this place my home over the course of five years. That’s all the more reason why such issues bother me so much. Is anyone listening?
*I apologize if I have hurt anyone’s sentiments here. That was not my intention (why would it be anyway..)
I agree with you on most of your points :)
Chennai . Its a “standard ” .. lol
you should see this:
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=101795436561661
Neeta wrote:
“We get a mail from Dean of Student Affairs saying – ‘Unwarranted behavior: Roaming/sitting in dark or isolated places with opposite sex during unearthly hours.’
Not just this – students fed up of general moral policing by security people everywhere.”
Looks like we are not alone :P
@Abhinav: most is good ;) I could rant for ever about this. But I do like to have a good mood at the end of it.
@Vaneet: Very sad indeed. IIT Kanpur seemed unexpectedly better even if for the 10 days I spent there.
Totally agree with it. The admin laying down rules on the LAN ban really serves no purpose. I don’t think anyone ended up going to class or not watching porn ( like the dean said) because of the LAN ban. And the double standards, that just sounds terribly annoying.
Not all of it is policing issues, the exemptions are party because of the mentality of security & mess folks who still feel inferior to foreigners and find it difficult to argue or deny their requests. I think that mentality perpetuates even among higher officials which can be attributed to lack of confidence!
@ Anirudh: Righto!
@ Aniket: Thats really sad. This implies that not only are these officials scared of harmless 20 year olds just because they are fair, but they seriously believe in the policies they are promoting (enforcing) on 20 year old adults.
Yes, you can say that I guess. Dint it appear obvious in the first place?
Umm, no. I don’t seem to give them a benefit of doubt :P I was just trying to follow their thought process which mainly consists of enforcing rules based on illogical reasoning. The fact that they are actually afraid of someone hence did not come to my mind ;-)
By the way, my trusted sorce just confirmed that the aforementioned incident was happening in the hostel quadrangle, out in the open, for everyone to see :P I am suggesting he be ready with a camera the next time this happens :D
This is sad… I know a vegetarian’s plight in Paris first-hand :(